Skip to content

Model Serving Architecture

This guide covers the technical aspects of serving LLMs in production, focusing on architectural patterns and implementation strategies. The choice of serving architecture significantly impacts performance, cost, and operational complexity.

Serving Patterns

Basic Architectures

A typical model serving architecture consists of multiple components working together to handle client requests efficiently and reliably:

graph TB
    Client[Client Requests] --> Router[Router/Load Balancer]
    Router --> S1[Model Server 1]
    Router --> S2[Model Server 2]
    Router --> Sn[Model Server n]

    S1 --> Cache[Shared Cache]
    S2 --> Cache
    Sn --> Cache

    subgraph Model Servers
    S1
    S2
    Sn
    end

Implementation Approaches

Single-Model Serving

The simplest approach to model serving involves deploying a single model per service. This pattern offers: - Direct model-to-service mapping for clear resource allocation - Dedicated resources per model, preventing resource contention - Simplified monitoring and scaling through isolated metrics - Best for specialized use cases requiring consistent performance

This approach works well for applications with stable workloads and specific model requirements, though it may lead to resource underutilization.

Multi-Model Serving

A more sophisticated approach that hosts multiple models on shared infrastructure: - Multiple models share computational resources efficiently - Dynamic resource allocation based on demand patterns - Complex orchestration requirements for model lifecycle - Efficient resource utilization through sharing

This pattern is ideal for organizations serving multiple models with varying usage patterns, enabling better resource utilization and cost optimization.

Hybrid Serving

Combines aspects of both approaches for maximum flexibility: - Balances dedicated and shared resources based on requirements - Enables flexible deployment options for different model types - Optimizes mixed workloads through intelligent routing - Provides advanced routing capabilities for complex scenarios

Hybrid serving is particularly useful when dealing with a mix of critical and non-critical models, or when different models have varying performance requirements.

Scaling Strategies

Horizontal Scaling

Horizontal scaling involves adding more model serving instances to handle increased load: - Load balancer configuration ensures even request distribution - Instance management handles server lifecycle - State synchronization maintains consistency across instances - Cache consistency prevents stale responses

This approach is particularly effective for stateless serving patterns and can provide linear scaling capabilities.

Vertical Scaling

Vertical scaling optimizes individual server resources: - Resource allocation maximizes server utilization - GPU utilization strategies for optimal throughput - Memory management techniques prevent bottlenecks - Performance optimization through hardware acceleration

This strategy is crucial for maximizing the performance of GPU-accelerated model serving.

Auto-scaling

Intelligent scaling based on demand: - Metrics-based scaling responds to real-time requirements - Predictive scaling anticipates load patterns - Cost optimization balances performance and expense - Resource limits prevent runaway scaling

Auto-scaling combines the benefits of both horizontal and vertical scaling, automatically adjusting resources based on demand patterns.

Production Considerations

Performance Monitoring

Comprehensive monitoring ensures reliable operation: - Latency tracking across the serving pipeline - Throughput metrics for capacity planning - Resource utilization for optimization - Error rates for quality assurance

High Availability

Robust availability requires multiple layers of redundancy: - Redundancy patterns prevent single points of failure - Failover strategies maintain service continuity - Health checks detect issues early - Recovery procedures minimize downtime

Cost Optimization

Efficient resource usage controls operational costs: - Resource scheduling maximizes utilization - Batch processing improves throughput - Caching strategies reduce computation - Load prediction enables proactive scaling

Model Serving and Management Tools

Core Management Tools

LLM Ops

Microsoft's comprehensive tool for managing large language models in production.

Open LLM

Run inference with open-source large-language models, deploy to cloud or on-premises, and build powerful AI apps.

Deployment Solutions

vLLM

High-throughput and memory-efficient inference engine with PagedAttention.

Text Generation Inference

Optimized inference solution from Hugging Face with advanced features like continuous batching.

FastAPI Template

Production-ready template for serving ML models with FastAPI.

Deployment Patterns

Model Serving Architectures

graph TB
    Client[Client Requests] --> Router[Router/Load Balancer]
    Router --> S1[Model Server 1]
    Router --> S2[Model Server 2]
    Router --> Sn[Model Server n]

    S1 --> Cache[Shared Cache]
    S2 --> Cache
    Sn --> Cache

    subgraph Model Servers
    S1
    S2
    Sn
    end

Architectural Patterns

Single-Model Serving

Single Model Pattern

Basic pattern for serving a single model version.

  • Direct model-to-service mapping
  • Simplest deployment strategy
  • Suitable for small-scale applications
  • Limited scaling capabilities

Multi-Model Serving

Multi-Model Pattern

Advanced pattern for serving multiple models efficiently.

  • Shared resource utilization
  • Dynamic model loading/unloading
  • Memory optimization
  • Resource pooling

Model Ensemble

Model Ensemble

Pattern for combining multiple models for inference.

  • Improved accuracy through combination
  • Fault tolerance
  • Specialized model routing
  • Weighted predictions

Serving Patterns

Synchronous Serving

  • Real-time inference
  • Request-response pattern
  • Direct client communication
  • Latency-sensitive applications

Asynchronous Serving

  • Batch processing
  • Queue-based processing
  • Background jobs
  • High-throughput applications

Hybrid Serving

  • Combined sync/async processing
  • Priority-based routing
  • Flexible scaling
  • Optimized resource usage

Scaling Patterns

Horizontal Scaling

  • Instance replication
  • Load balancing
  • Session affinity
  • Geographic distribution

Vertical Scaling

  • Resource optimization
  • GPU utilization
  • Memory management
  • Compute optimization

Dynamic Scaling

  • Auto-scaling policies
  • Load-based scaling
  • Cost optimization
  • Resource efficiency